10 reviews

Upkeep
3.7
Shot variety/design
4.0
Tee areas
2.0
Signage/wayfinding
2.6
Amenities
2.2
Scenery/views
4.2
midrangedmadman

@midrangedmadman

2

The second half of the course was a lot better than this first half And it was hard to tell the par

jkjuggernaut

@jkjuggernaut

4

Fun course. Longer than just a beginner course, but not too long. Good use of the small elevation changes there are. Usually not busy. Well maintained, but sometimes the grass is a little long in places. Great place to learn to play.

1
seandobryan

@seandobryan

34

Needs tee signs and teepads. Great 9 hole other than that!

pandaloverhk

@pandaloverhk

8

Wish there were tee pads, but overall a great course.

After playing Front 9
smokeman4life

@smokeman4life

Great course with plenty of shade and future growth from 9 hole to 18 hole.

damenw

@damenw

142

Pay attention at hole three. No number on wooden post. Hole three is across road, the unmarked post is hole 8. I would rate it better with updated baskets on front 9. Also needs tee pads and tee signs.

After playing Main
lilxdrummerxboy

@lilxdrummerxboy

Cool little course design. Somewhat short but more than a putter course. Needs some love and work and it will be an awesome beginner course!

papadomthebeard

@papadomthebeard

Fun. Great distance from pin to basket. Can't wait for the back 9 to be done.

garrettw

@garrettw

Needed mowing when I was there. Wood posts for tee boxes and baskets are clearly numbered. Mix of long and short holes.

montehines

@montehines

Dropped from a 5 star to a 3 star. One star for branches hanging down on tee boxes, roots in tee boxes and lack of definitive tee box markings. Second star lost due to course confusion. If a recreational level course to encourage people to play branches need trimmed to reopen shot lanes. If a more challenging course concrete tee pads needed to provide a consistent level throwing surface. If volunteer needed to trim branches I would be glad to help. Facebook message me.