C.P. Adams Park
260 reviews (showing 1–20)
@gabe9006
Stop redesigning this course. Adding 3 holes last Fall was fine but the new basket and tee locations is senseless. #teeboxeseverywhere
@travismc3p0
What an absolute gem of a course with the redesign. Long tees to long baskets is super challenging and incredibly rewarding when executed well. Long to shorts is a lot of fun while still being challenging, same as shorts to longs. Short to short is great for intermediate and a challenge for beginners. Only improvement I'd like to see is some buckthorn cleanup to make the rough a little more playable.
@ummyaumm
Not fun at all. Too many long holes with impossible pars. Hole 19 is a joke.
@badcompany79
Not a fan of new layout. Dirt tees and weird shot shape/spray and pray or punished makes it a slog.
@bigglz
Previously it was probably my 3rd favorite courses to play in the around with in 2 hour drive. New Baskets was much over due as well as treepads. Edit: yes it's nice to have new shots, but not when the flow is actually even more dangerous getting to and from 6-11 or 12. Before all you had to worry about was 3 and like 14 sharing 1 fairway.
@harleja29
This course really deserves to be closer to a 4.5. It needs a little work with tee signs and directions but other than that it really has it all. Tight lines, woods, long bombs, and elevation. If it wasn't a long drive I'd play here very often
@thedominantlock
Great course, lots of missing tee pads for the longs, and a bit more signage would help.
@drumm3rn4ut
The course is mostly finished at this point. Overall, it offers a great variety of shots between the short and long pads. From the short to short, this course creates a fun ace run round for more experienced players and a fun challenge for those of all skill levels. From the long to long, this can be a daunting course with multiple long tunnels and difficult par 3s. However, the par 4s are very scoreable and a par 5 could be implemented in a few spots as a combo. Pedestrians always have the right of way, so look before you throw. I would like to see both short and long positions have a basket, with a few of the shorts being moved out of the fairway slightly.
@chuck15335
Really need to be able to throw 300+ to make this remotely enjoyable.
@jimjohnson
Shortly hole layout pars are all incorrect but overall very enjoyable
@stuartsch
New Mach7 baskets. New layout on UDisc with Long Tees in the grass. Will give 5 Stars when New tee pads.
@jonnyt123
I think the course now is good. I think the course before is also good. The changes probably weren’t necessary, but I think they are still really fun holes here with a solid amount of variety. Yes, they are long, but that doesn’t mean it’s bad. I will say though, the zigzagging is a bit confusing and is my only real critique; it doesn’t flow super well. The holes by themselves are great though!
@dannybetlock
Great mix of woods and open and long and short distance shots. Even the bombs have interesting elevation or old trees to manage.
@discgolfwilly
Needs more garbage and recycling bins on the back nine
@thrillhouse
Why is the long layout not active?
@billthecrusher
Really fun shots over a beautiful property. Long & short tees and lots of long/short pin locations. 21 holes (pads/signs meh). New beautiful Mach7s
@prestidigit8tor
The latest redesign has turned a once fun and challenging course into an easy putt and approach course. Course is very confusing to follow with random tee pads all over the place and very poor signage. UDisc is a must to know where you are going. Only real positive is that it has great new Mach 7 baskets.
@tonyengen
This course is one of the best in the Twin Cities since the redesign. This is probably one of the first redesigns I've ever seen that has made the course 100% better. Lots of long bomber holes you can just grip it and rip it on, but also a good share of technical woods holes that test your skill and aim. Great job on this redesign, I will be playing this course way more often than I used to. My only gripe is there is still no teepad on the long shot for hole 15, fix that and it's 5 stars instead of 4.5. Also, 19 as a 600' (probably more like 650'...), uphill par 3 is a little ridiculous.