Calverton DGC

@nyxtro

Nice course but for $10 I’d expect there to at least be tee pads and map layouts on every hole

@masonalschuler

Signage was hard to follow and often missing. Some teeboxes were missing, others were in poor repair. The layout would've been pretty good if the course was better maintained. Not worth $10

@ysetl1

It's a fine course. Mostly open holes, a few long ones. The tee pads are pretty bad. Uneven and split. Asking for an ankle injury. Needs to be mowed. It would be fine if it was free. For $10, I'd expect better. Be aware, there are 2 water hazeds on 18 that you can't see from the tee pad.

@tarquin

Needs a mow and some new tee signs, but really interesting layout with lots of challenging shots. Could use some new tee pads too. Many are two pieces with a big gap in between.

@footsoldier914

Very well maintained fairways but a bunch of blue tees were missing maps. Would definitely play again now that I got a lay of the land.

@gpriore

On 17, what's the deal with that stump at the end of the tee pad? Not safe

@bwinkl3r

Total overhaul of tee positions and signage in April 2021 earns this course an extra star. Easy to find each hole, which are now shorter and more par-able. And gotta love the post-apocalyptic golf-course vibe.

@jpassa

Course needs signs in the worst way. Some tees hard to find, also some holes are not intuitive and need signage as we had to walk out the hole to find where we had to throw. If this minor inconvenience is fixed this would be an amazing course

@papadunham

The re design is great fun shots great lines. Blues are challenging maybe not so much for those who can bomb all in all good fun

@tommyballz

Old golf course grounds so pretty well maintained and manicured. A few tree holes, lots of bombers. New layout not yet in UDisc but pretty intuitive with walking distances between hole and next tee box literally halved for 1-12. And the long walk to 13 only. Well done. Generally easy for experienced players but really good for novice like me.

@republic66

Definitely needs some TLC. Hard/confusing to navigate even with UDisc. Still had a fun time for sure!!! 🤙🥏🤙🥏

@zabelboots

No tee signs to go with inaccurate layout on the UDisc map. Good straight shots after you realize where you should have been throwing to.

@korterpounder

5/10, pros: corse was maintained well and layout was interesting. Cons: udisc map isnt up to date and water hazards are not clearly marked at all. Beware hole 16.

@patrickstar181

Really great course! This course was redesigned with several new holes as of 2021. It plays very smooth and offers a great variety of challenging holes. Lookout for groundhogs and garter snakes and other beautiful wildlife on this fun course out east!

@gslansky

Tees and holes are not marked clearly. Lots of holes are missing teepads. Staff is great and helpful to find first few holes.

@hyoomac

Sandy soil, rolling elevation, water and gusty winds make “links-style” golf. Great use of woods and treelines. Next Tee signs are decent. Some long walks. Difficult transitions to follow are to #12 and to #16. Use the map. Mats are beat up and signage is almost non-existent - that’s bad for a $10 pay-to-play course. Still, it’s worth playing because the design is great.

@joshthemadtitan

Half the pads had turf mats, half had nothing. Tees are very poorly labeled and some signs point in the opposite direction. Needs maintenance, some tees are missing entirly. If you like open courses and know your way around it would be a 2 and a half.

@fxr1128

Signs and tees are very poorly maintained

@iucreynlis

Nice layout, but watch for ticks. A bit confusing so keep UDisc handy. With better maintenance, it could be a much better course. Some baskets are deep in woods, and it seems a bit neglected.

@gslater41

Fun course. Had some trouble finding next tee boxes on a few holes. But still a nice course