@kthunder95
Boring. Such a waste of nice amenities, signage, and excellent tee pads with thoughtless design. The use of the trees in the open areas is non-existent. I would not recommend this course.
@dolladollabill
Tale of two nines. The front nine is basically all open holes with one or maybe two trees on one or two of the holes. The back nine offered a couple of wooded shots, and mixed up the length well. Hole 17 alone made me rethink the score I gave it. Worth a play if you’re within 20-30 minutes, wouldn’t drive much further
@deerslayer1967
More than meets the eye. Loved it overall especially the back 9
@dabbindemon
Nice distance holes to open up and a more technical wooded back nine
@jkc323
Front nine has been changed. Not a fan at all of the changes. Seems like a waste of money to make it worse than it was. Back nine is still in need of some shrub and branch trimming. Bridges are great.
@caincanine
Somewhat playable, but certainly a work in progress. Not a terribly interesting location, even if it were completed.
@vhatley
7 of the front 9 basket locations are wrong on U-Disc. Confusing layout, you see several baskets in front of you and never sure which to throw too. Not impressed.
@jordeen
simple park course with a fun back 9 excited about the remodel
@timdennis
2nd week in a row we have tried to play this course but can't because people park all over the course.......done trying for awhile
@maxboomer13
Needs mowed, needs the trees trimbed.
@hotnickels
Pretty nice. Few wet spots. Looks like they've been working on it!
@doddyj10
Skip the front nine play the back.
@jcook83
Fun little course . Enjoyed the back 9. Nice tee pads all around
@jakedahl7
Need mowing
@adambeard
Fun park with great tee pads. Signage could be improved, you have to walk behind each tee pad to read them. There are no arrows pointing to the next tee pad.
@darrien13
Front 9 is literally just throwing into a field with 35 mph winds.
@masonharrell97
Front 9 is very open but alright. Back 9 was very fun!