123 reviews (showing 1–20)

Upkeep
3.8
Shot variety/design
3.8
Tee areas
3.5
Signage/wayfinding
3.0
Amenities
2.8
Scenery/views
3.7
pjsprinkles

@pjsprinkles

35

I think this course could use a redesign to be 18 holes. It'd lead to less basket confusion from the tee. New tee signs with hole layouts would also improve the course greatly. Some tight shots out there, avoid thick rough.

1
cbrewsterdg

@cbrewsterdg

36

Great for a quick round after work. If the bridge is flooded, you can play the available holes in less than an hour. A lot of easy holes that don’t require much effort. Mostly open fairways with some trees. Pars are very generous and should probably be adjusted(plenty of eagle opportunities). Overall, the course needs updating but it’s still playable as it is.

fleabitten69

@fleabitten69

172

Half the tee pads are full of water creek was too high to cross to holes 6,7,8,9,10,11.

After playing 21 Shorts
exelundt

@exelundt

43

Fun course! Well kept with a clean river!

After playing Long Tees, Full 21
billkelly81

@billkelly81

29

Course in fair shape. Still some standing water, but getting better!!

ging3rvituz

@ging3rvituz

39

Signage is all over the place. Fun layout but plenty of holes on the back 9 that throw towards other pads.

dingle86

@dingle86

38

Very fun course. Holes 6-11 are inaccessible if water is high in the river do to there being no bridge. Very well kept. Only downside to the design is it seems that to often to reach the next tee pad you have to cross in front of a different hole or the next tee pad is almost directly in line with another hole.

myodes

@myodes

35

Needs a bridge

3
solidbond

@solidbond

48

An ok course but it has far too many crossover holes and a ridiculous bridge that’s a safety hazard with running water, rocks, and old wood on it.

After playing Long Tees, Full 21
nhighsmith

@nhighsmith

39

Good holes when you cross the river but mostly flat otherwise

donchoad

@donchoad

140

Cart friendly. Better than the rating suggest.

tomsdiscgolf

@tomsdiscgolf

143

Current pins combine 2 UDisc layouts so scoring is screwed up for longs.

obisok

@obisok

41

Extremely easy the way the pars are recorded on udisc. This should 100% be a par3 only course. But, it’s a great course to bring your putters and a few midranges to and get some practice.

After playing Long Tees, Full 21
1
marciniak1

@marciniak1

45

Quite possibly the most boring course I’ve played to date. The course fails to provide what a good nine hole park course can. This is the closest to mini golf being translated to disc golf that I’ve seen, but instead of the holes being a fun variety of ace runs, it’s repetitive, flat, straight shots over and over again. There are also a lot of confusing tee pads and pins, so if you aren’t feeling like hitting a lot of repetitive chip shots, I’d avoid this course.

After playing Long Tees, Full 21
brycehanke

@brycehanke

25

Ghhh

joekleckler

@joekleckler

60

21 holes, always hard to find where to go, definitely use udisc

mdtucker84

@mdtucker84

28

Fun course, some challenging holes 6-11 Par on the long tees is not correct!

greenguy3

@greenguy3

25

Somewhat confusing layout

After playing 21 Shorts
discindingus

@discindingus

66

Bridge to the backside has three drainage holes that consistently become clogged. Which results in high water.

After playing Long Tees, Full 21
jdobbins2

@jdobbins2

70

Redesign could make this course a gem!

After playing Long Tees, Full 21