Jericho Lake DGC

@benschlecht

52

Great beginner friendly course

@jonathanseff

50

Not a very fun course. The front 9 is okay and the back is 10-15ft wide fairways with tall grass in both sides. Anything outside c1 is tallgrass

@brich22

51

With Stuart sports complex closed for maintenance, it’s a little confusing on the course map to figure out where to park/walk for back 9.

@roykisseberth

71

#8 barely 12’ fairway, very challenging. The rest of front 9 fairly easy for this 78 year old.

@azncontagion

48

Front 9 way better than back 9. Back 9 is meadows and tall grass. Gots watch closely where your discs fall.

@jestersfire

95

Nice front nine in the back nine is almost completely Ace run fun little course

@geigerhyzer

291

Clean park style course. The front 9 is pretty solid, but the back nine is just tight mowed fairways in on open field of tall grass and plants.

@proflowery

85

Holes are fun enough but the layout isn’t great. 1-9 and 10-18 might as well be separate courses

@tomsantoyo

65

Solid park play for the front nine. The back still has one set of tees facing another and you have to walk through the fairway of 10 to get to 12

@apadula14

89

Too many extremely short holes and the flow is pretty bad after hole 9 when you have to walk 4 football fields to hole 10 and then from 18 walk even further to get back to the parking lot. Property has tons of potential with a better layout and use of land but overall a really fun putter/mid course for beginners

@hanglor

41

good front 9. back 9 not so much.

@mimibyrd

49

Decent course. Could use some better signage. Has some fun shot shapes but a lot of tall grass.

@vipermike64

34

I like the expansion of the back 9. A bit tight in spots if it were busy. Front nine has the creek hazards if you have an errant throw. Pro/Am pads are great. Back nine will have long grass/growth in summer. Don't throw badly during the high growth times since it isn't mowed.

@lossingdiscs

71

Short and long tee pads offer slight variations. Front 9 is much better with the back being mostly prairie grass fields with some small trees.

@danfrediani

134

Worst redesign ever. It would be a challenge to make it worse.

@wraith777

85

Please make a smart layout for “Efficient 18-hole” (Front 9 Short + Front 9 Long). That walk from 9-10 is just brutal. Bring back old 10 over creek shot and old hole 17.

@nfairley

93

Front 9 ok.

@alexanderc

62

Back 9 redesign ruined the charm of this course. If I wanted flat and boring, this just made the top of that list. I hope the park district reads our collective disappointment.

@illasloan926

134

Way better as the old layout on the back 9

@manderson

169

Why? 3 stars for the front nine, -1 star for the “new” back nine. Sad and terrible