@raelza
Basket for hole 5 appears to be missing. Back 9 could use some grass cutting
@donqtrurbg
Hole 5 and 6 need to be confirmed. One of the baskets seems to be missing.
@ghat8609
Course signage was good with the exception of Hole 5. Other than that it’s a good technical course. Be prepared for a good hike!
@thejasonlively
Great course . Good variety and a bit challenging but nothing extreme. Technical , fun , beautiful forest scenery. Very serene
@bhbxray
No real fairways. Very narrow road/trails for fairways. Technical shots required.
@318bigjerm
A lot of potential, but very poorly maintained. The map on here is also off. Signage doesn't match and isn't accurate. Fairways were thin but fair Super Technical, but you easily kick off of trees into the rough and let me tell you...boy is it ROUGH!
@trentonrichard
Trees Trees Trees
@jth079
Fun but needs major sign overhaul, hard finding next tee from previous basket
@mikilee
Front nine is overgrown, but it is traversable. The back 9....no thanks.
@anthonygruszka
Spent most of my time looking for discs. Yes, they need to clean up some brush and mow fairways. For $3 charged at the entrance, money should not be the issue. I'll pass until they invest some time in making the course playable. I lost a gray Warden; hit me up if u find it
@david42
Most technical course I’ve played since it’s so heavily wooded and quite hilly. It’s got character and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Good signage. Could use a bit of upkeep, but not much to complain about.
@areedpv3
Needs to be upkept better
@matthew1995
Great layout fun course,but needs course management to clear fallen trees
@grahammeyers
This would be a fun course if the state park actually kept up with the course. Tight technical lines.
@vonrasmussen
Terrible layout
@brody8
Very fun course to play, but grass long on some holes.