95 reviews (showing 1–20)

Upkeep
4.1
Shot variety/design
4.3
Tee areas
3.6
Signage/wayfinding
4.0
Amenities
2.7
Scenery/views
3.8
wsecord

@wsecord

124

No bathrooms. Had benches and trash cans. 1$ to play. Rolling terrain. Well placed baskets. We were happy with shorts. Longs are narrow and technical. Great course

1
smain1

@smain1

37

Signage was decent but would be better with maps. Tee pads seem a little short.

1
dbbyz01

@dbbyz01

40

Nice course. Different shot setups to keep up the variety. My only complaint would be better signs to next hole, since there is a long walk between tee pads. Udisc is helpful for that.

joshwinslow

@joshwinslow

74

great course with good wayfinding, some fairways are not that clearly defined but enjoyable challenge relative to par

1
zekenitz

@zekenitz

70

Great course for people who can throw at least 350. The pars are very fair and allow for scoring on the long holes. Lot of shot variety and elevation.

1
scootladychi

@scootladychi

41

Gorgeous course. Landscape used phenomenally to design different shot shapes for the holes. Benches at almost each, shorts and longs at each. I don't know what it looked like before they redid the course to 18 but it is an absolutely fantastic. 18. Docked it half a star for lack of a bathroom.

1
zaccattack

@zaccattack

102

Typical west Michigan course - technical woods holes, lots of straight shots, and a little hilly.

superfly98sl

@superfly98sl

39

Played here for a tournament and quickly found that this is probably my favorite course I’ve played. Love the need for placement golf and not a full blast off every tee. Definitely a more surgical course than most. The longs layout is tough but fair with par or even birdie being very doable. But bogeys are always one bad shot away too

2
tenfold76

@tenfold76

113

Played the shorts, fun for a technical course

1
jaytime

@jaytime

50

Fun course, good flow through many acres of shaded forest. Tee pads or small, different sizes and textures, all are level except 17. I would recommend if in ludington area and I would play again. Baskets and tpad upgrades would make this course most excellent.

1
potgeter

@potgeter

70

Better than the previous Leviathan layout

1
oneacesofar

@oneacesofar

43

It's not bad The signage needs to be updated a little better Yes I know we're following u disc but it would be really nice to have a work be an update the signs for directions of the baskets for people like me who have never been here before but I got to tell you you guys are doing a great job fixing it up

1
jawnxotic

@jawnxotic

43

Some of my favorite fours I’ve ever thrown.

1
nattydaddy

@nattydaddy

91

A course that with some work could be amazing. New pads, and a redesign with more shot variety and a better layout would really be awesome. Awesome piece of land to play on, very technical and fun otherwise.

2
pjdestroyo

@pjdestroyo

40

Great wooded course. Challenging and beginner tees. Had a fun round with friends!

arouwhorst

@arouwhorst

47

Tee pads are a wreck. The course is well designed and plenty of elevation change.

samschumaker

@samschumaker

49

I like the new layout. Great signage and now it doesn’t take the whole afternoon to play. Still challenging for all skill levels with a variety of shot shapes. Still lots of trees. A good middle ground between the old long and short layouts

1
lordphelgar

@lordphelgar

132

The redesign is nice

1
nastynotary

@nastynotary

39

The new 18 shorts is great, good shot variety and good mix of distance and short. Wayfinding has improved, a few teepads need to be spruced up.

1
sparky387

@sparky387

61

Rough right now due to the course update. A lot of the old signage is still up and there are a lot of abandoned pads. Hopefully they get the new marking up and clean out the old stuff.