@coookieman
This course could be a really nice course. The first half is really close fairways to each other. There is enough room to add fairways around the perimeter of the field and take some of the holes in the first half and put them near the field. Alternate going to and from the perimeter. The average discgolfer doesn’t need the bomber holes.
@jackieboo
Neat short course kind of crowded on first 5 holes no tee pads. Very hazardous first holes because of the creek I have to climb down and risk falling in at one point. Not as bad as other reviews say
@hexforlife
horrible, please don’t waste your time.
@hyoomac
Starts in a narrow grove of newly-planted trees. Dangerous layout: holes 3 and 4 come back along the same strip as 2, so you’re going to be throwing at other players. Then hole 5 throws through a narrow gap directly over the first tee. Finishes with multiple holes across a wide open field. Not sure who would really enjoy this course. I guess it’s a way to kill time while kids go to baseball practice. Detailed review at Discgolfcoursereview.com
@mrh357
The first 4-5 holes have so many small trees that you can't even see a fairwar on most of them.
@monroemiller
The one hole did not have a fairway. I had to throw over all the trees
@jiminytrickitjr
Needs redesigned needs a map on UDisc not worth the drive
@tristansmucker
This course is a disaster. Signs are switched. Tee pads are non-existent and areas are often slippery. Tall weeds and poison abound. Holes 1-4 are disastrously positioned in a strip of thick trees along river. Holes 6-9 are nearly identical par 4's across a multipurpose field often taken over by people playing softball. Needs a caretaker.