24 reviews (showing 1–20)

Upkeep
2.5
Shot variety/design
3.4
Tee areas
1.6
Signage/wayfinding
2.0
Amenities
2.6
Scenery/views
3.6
smokinjoe420

@smokinjoe420

52

Do yourself a favor and skip this course. First, the layout is terrible. Every hole is a blind shot through ridiculous amounts of trees, saplings, brush, bushes, weeds and everything else they've let over grow. Second, there's no directions, signage, paths and the tee pads are not correct on Udisc. I barley found hole 15 (FYI its next to hole 18. Also, I never found hole 16. Third, most of the holes are too far apart from each other and they don't need to be. This park is perfect for a disc golf course however, the course it has is horrible! Would not recommend.

2
roadto501

@roadto501

1212

What in the name of Zoose's anoose is this place? Caught it hours after mowing (and rain), thankful for that bit of mercy. Long and lumpy, wide open but cruelly wooded at times. Come and see!

hugeeaglesfan20

@hugeeaglesfan20

31

Front 9 was pretty decent. UDisc app for some of back 9 was difficult to find. Hole 15 isn’t even close. Tee pads are grass except for first hole which is turf. Hole 18 requires quite a carry straight over the lake.

After playing Main
kingbohee

@kingbohee

10

Unplayable, tons of potential. But completely untaken care of and very poorly marked.

After playing Main
anthonypasek

@anthonypasek

149

So much potential here with even just a few upgrades. Pretty roughly maintained back 9 with difficult navigation (even with mapped layout). Some memorable holes but just overall lacking when weighing all the attributes.

c2carlson

@c2carlson

Could be great, lots of shape shots,, mixed with long shots and tunnel shots. Not for beginners, narrow fairways with waist high over grown borders, hiking boots suggested.,

justinschulz3

@justinschulz3

Course design on back 9 was too tight and under kept for a recreational course. Additionally tee on UDisc did not match the tee placements in real life.

booger1982

@booger1982

Needs to be better maintained

ikerid13

@ikerid13

Course lacks good upkeep, signage, and tee pads. If updated a bit, it has the potential to be a great course.

paulmulholland

@paulmulholland

With exception of holes 5 & 6, the front nine is a very decent and playable course. Holes 5 & 6 along with the entire back nine are not playable due to overgrowth. Clearly nobody takes care of this course. Too bad because the course has the potential to be really good.

1
kzimat

@kzimat

1

Very enjoyable park, the back 9 are in the natural canvas of the area which makes it challenging

After playing Main
njcorrigan23

@njcorrigan23

Impossible to play in the spring/summer if you’re not trying to lose half your bag. I’ve gone a few times this fall. Holes 1, 2 (made up tee), 4, 7, 8, and 9 played three times through can make a nice 18. Haven’t even tried the back 9 due to the lack of lines and general messiness. This course has incredible potential, but it seems like it’s been thrown in to say that Greenville has a disc golf course. I wish it was better because there really isn’t a solid 18 hole course near here.

crabfoot

@crabfoot

Course was mowed. After that, could not find tees, no tee boxes, could not find baskets. A wasted effort for an area with potential.

theconnormilos

@theconnormilos

Some holes arnt playable cause of over growth

farmer6179

@farmer6179

Needs trimmed up bad , the back mostly

bingshoet

@bingshoet

Poorly maintained, overgrown, can’t find tee offs

bond207

@bond207

Front nine good layout ...but poor signage didn't play back nine

bieks1

@bieks1

I love the front nine, but the back nine needs too much maintenance

rayb16

@rayb16

Front 9 is fine. Back 9 isn’t kept up and hard to find tee boxes and baskets without this app. Back 9 is almost unplayable. Would be a beautiful course if it were kept up.

tylertwh

@tylertwh

Back 9 is hardly maintained. Front 9 is fantastic.