193 reviews (showing 1–20)

Upkeep
3.6
Shot variety/design
3.6
Tee areas
3.0
Signage/wayfinding
2.8
Amenities
3.4
Scenery/views
3.4
joemama26

@joemama26

45

Fantastic wooded & trailed course. -The pad direction of #4 is not facing the basket & this was confusing. -The pad for 6 is in the wrong location on UDisc. -Move pin to A location on 14. -17 basket location needs changed to A.

kayakpirate

@kayakpirate

96

Need better signage.It's hard to navigate. I rn into three other people that couldn't find their way around

jcarr898

@jcarr898

79

Straight wooded holes, but some fun ace runs. Pretty overgrown.

mosaic13

@mosaic13

49

Need UDisc to navigate

1
mitchellgill17

@mitchellgill17

69

Very fun short course. I like it

senorrussell

@senorrussell

93

All the wooden shots are pretty much the same

kfree35

@kfree35

163

Eh. The og holes are nice park/woods mix that’s pretty beginner friendly. The new woods holes need some serious clean up to be more friendly for casual players. Overall the course is now almost exclusively 150-300 foot shots with a lot of tough lines even though the holes are short. Bad rough in the woods, you can’t see the basket from most of the teepads, and signs not indicating the pin location makes it tough for players new to the course. My opinion of the course has gone up a bit with playing it more. Not poorly designed but I would like to see a bit more variety in length of holes and maybe open some fairways up a bit

3
devdevsand

@devdevsand

76

Tee pads facing wrong direction, fairways not clear, signage very outdated.

tmorris89

@tmorris89

82

This is the worst course in STL. Wooded holes are so poorly cleared it’s nuts.

daveshar

@daveshar

116

Nice city park course 🥏

1
palmpilot

@palmpilot

47

Lots of undergrowth has been cleared out this season making the course a lot friendlier to newer players. Tight techy woods golf for the most part, lots of elevation changes.

michaelus02

@michaelus02

58

Concrete pads on the new holes would be an upgrade. Hole 4 is particularly confusing with the newer layout.

1
jdeluca2

@jdeluca2

56

Woods could use a little better flight paths. I’m good with narrow lines but seems less thought out.

maxfowler8800

@maxfowler8800

47

Poor course design while in the woods. Hardly can find baskets and any available lines. Was it fun? Yes. Would I come back? Yes.

mr2222

@mr2222

51

Don’t get confused by hole 4. Signage needs work.

1
anthonypasek

@anthonypasek

178

While the new wooded holes are technical yet gettable the turf tees in the woods are absolute garbage. Some are inclined incredibly steeply and really render some of the tee shots very dangerous. Overall the update from 9 holes to 18 is a mixed blessing...unfortunately.

calvinc44

@calvinc44

111

Iconic STL family course. A good time, a lot more wooded now but lines still exist. New tee pads aren’t great but the new tee signs are a lot nicer

joeymrules

@joeymrules

81

Leaves in the fall/winter make it impossible to find discs. Narrow fair ways. It’s an alright course. Good shot variety.

chipbloch

@chipbloch

57

Beautiful course, good for both beginners and veterans. Nice mix of open and wooded areas, but the entire course is well-shaded. A few difficult holes at the end, but very enjoyable.

mranderson57

@mranderson57

79

Great course that has technical shots but is fair for all levels of play.