Pine Trace Park Disc Golf Course

@dahlstar

39

Strange course design. A bunch of ~200’ par 3’s with absolutely no line to the basket. Par 4’s where all you do is throw a 200’ shot off the tee then chip up to the pin. Overall a very boring course for all the hype it received the past few years. Probably won’t be back.

@vinsanity88

30

Truly awful. The only reason this isn't zero stars is because the baskets and tee pads are very nice. Its everything in between that is uniquely terrible. Won't play here again until a significant re-design.

@bhoop3603

65

TERRIBLE DESIGN. Better off scrapping it and starting over.

@kafrikoo

23

For now, 3 stars. The course is super challenging and the problems it offers are unique. After speaking to staff, they do have trees and such marked for removal but couldn’t get it done before the unveiling. This course is going to get massaged in to an excellent woods course that the area needs to compliment Wannamaker.

@discchris

39

I guess It’s a good course to work on your flick.. I would not go back.

@johnlago

45

Played today with my 2 frequent partners. Scored -1, +2, +11(me). Course was very dry and paths were clear. Lots of reviews trash this course. Our consensus was that this is a very challenging course, tight lines, requiring good placement shots. We all liked it. Yes, there are lines that need to be cleaned up. There are some low ceiling shots that could be raised. The course honestly just needs break-in time. If you haven't played here, don't rule it out based on crappy reviews. Get out there and see for yourself. We plan to be back and I plan to play better.

@wrwtennis11

70

I first thought the poor reviews were people hating on woods courses…unfortunately this is the worst designed course in the Charleston area. Maybe the worst design I’ve ever played. Non existent fairways and shot shapes that don’t exist. So much land to work with too… The beauty of the main park area, practice putting area, and a Culver’s milkshake after are the only highlights from this experience.

@chubbo

73

TLDR: bad course, play Wanamaker or JICP instead Not good. Despite what the hopeful people say, I have a hard time seeing any improvement to the course (without demolishing entire groups of trees). The lines don’t make sense, most are extremely guarded by small trees, vines, and other things that shouldn’t be a part of a fairway. For the longer holes, if you’re off the dead center of the fairway, you’re most likely taking a score over par. None of the holes are fun to play or make it redeemable to come back.

@batadopolis

109

Effectively Wanamaker pre redesign. Holes 3, 7, and 18 all need to be changed. Clean up a majority of the rest a little and I think it’ll be good

@raccoonlord

63

Lots of time and effort went into building this course, it shows. But the design... is questionable. The course will be better after a reworking of some holes.

@tjseagrove

22

Great new course and many more rounds to come!!

@briandiscsling

61

Terrible course. Whoever designed this knows nothing about disc golf. Which is a shame it’s a great property with tons of potential if only someone with some sense would redesign it!!! Stay away if you’re a real player.

@ricolaaaaa

24

Needs a lot of work. Roots/acorns/sticks everywhere be careful walking. Fairways are relatively non existent, and tee signs are inaccurate.

@austinfc22

30

This corse should not have 4 signs with in reach from the tee box.

@awesomeawestin

21

Very technical

@discoholic

55

Great new course! Very challenging!

@clangles

22

Course has lots of potential. Lots of flukey fairways, but I’ve also played once so maybe haven’t learned the lines yet. In general I think if the fairways are opened up a bit more to give clear lines it could be great. Currently just a worse version of Wanamaker imo

@chiefchaindawg

16

This is a new course so I know they are actively taking feedback from players but there is a lot of work to be done to make it playable for all levels of players. Incredibly muddy and technical with trees all over the course making par seem near impossible.

@isaacbror

101

Similar to Wannamaker but different in a few ways: -Tighter gaps -Higher number of flukey shots -More par 4s & 5s -The par 4s & 5s are more demanding -The par 3s are shorter -Less elevation change and swampier Overall I'm glad to have another wooded course to practice gap hitting and scrambling, but if I had designed it, I would've tried to make it longer with wider, fairer fairways.

@ajettpruess

32

If you are a woods golfer, this is a new fav course for sure! Lots of cool holes and variety of hole difficulties. Also some nice views (but make sure to bring bug spray in the summer!!)