@huutsprodigy420
indeed this course is challenging , lots of walking, lots of shot variety, if your up for a challenge go for it, you probably wont be dissapointed or will be...
@tyhowey7
Fun course, worth playing every once in a while with cost being 5$
@1youngzj
Course is in really good shape overall. Few holes have new signs. Benches on most holes now. Currently not soggy and mosquitos are very low atm. Enjoy it while you can!
@smithlexg
Great technical wood course. Ready to see it get pads installed and some short baskets.
@rjmc64
Very challenging, needs better signage. Beautiful course with a good variety of shots. Will play again.
@omgimcalen
Really good medium length holes with several par 4's and a couple par 5's. Just teepads and some signs away from being a really good 4.5 star course!
@scootypuffjr
Great work being done here. You can see this developing into a beautiful course. Great job D.
@rlsmith34
Tee areas are not good but course is in the best shape i’v seen in along time due to it not being overgrown. Lost of different shot shapes. Great course!
@andrewljackson
Needs fine tuning. Reminds me off The Fort in Ogden the first 6 months. If the players will give her the attention she deserves.. She will shine eventually
@kallsen56199
Majority of tees are not clearly marked. The ones that are are just dirt/mud. Solid variety of shots excluding the amount of turnovers (RHBH). Poor course flow with very long transitions. No bridges for crossing water or steep valleys. Tee signs are alright but some are missing numbers. Fairways need to be beaten in more to create clear definition along with some additional clean up.
@cce02002
Great design, a great wooded course. The fairways are challenging, but fair and demand a variety of shot shapes, and you are rewarded for good placement. Not much OB, but going off the fairway will cost you. Most of all, the designers avoided gimmicks and one dimensional holes and just created really interesting fairway shapes. Natural tee pads and in a swampy area, so don't go after a heavy rainfall. Tee pads play fine, like playing from a fairway, but would be bad if muddy. If you can get over the fact that the tee pads aren't done, you are in for a great course.
@jonathanfrye
Had a very good time playing here. I am very happy to have another course in the area. Some shots are very demanding but fair. However, some holes seem too luck dependent, and the course needs some TLC (plant refuse piles on greens, overgrown in places, etc). Hole 14 sticks out as the one hole that needs a redesign, as players are expected to throw a blind hyzer over tennis courts (endangering the tennis players). Other than that, great course, and will be 5-star once it is finished.
@kpothegamer
Coming along well. Still needs more arrows on sign posts and baskets. Must use UDisc and sign posts to get where you need to go. Tough course, but good. Tee boxes are all dirt and slippery when wet.
@brettculver
Upkeep just needs a lot of work. Especially for a pay to play park
@ryankrick
Has tons of potential - fairways need to be kept better and very little room to throw, even while on the fairway. Once teepads are installed and brush and debris are cleared out, then Saluda Shoals could become one of the better courses around the area.
@toriellop
If they are going to charge entry then the park needs to take responsibility for this course; they take advantage of the course director. It has championship potential.
@posborne15
Not a bad layout but incredibly overgrown and swampy, even some basic upkeep like mowing the grass would make it more playable in its current state (pipeline excluded, there not much that can be done about that). Hopefully when the construction is done it can get some TLC.
@boonebenson
This course has the potential to be awesome but the layout, tee signs and areas, and directions made it a challenge to like.