@lucaskatz
Wonderful park course, technical but very approachable for beginners.

@zachbabka
Great course. Lots of trees

@screwattack
Fun course. Open and technical. Worth a play if you’re passing through especially. Signage is inconsistent. Seeing baskets is inconsistent. Those are the only two things keeping it from getting a higher score.

@cspeidel331
Great shorter, wooded course. Theres a few pretty questionable pin locations on the back 9, but still give it a go

@nicksmith00
Course #88 for me Out of 88 courses played, the front 9 of this course might’ve been my favorite front 9 I’ve ever played. The hole names are such a great touch, giving personality to the course. I arrived right as the sun was beginning to set, giving me the most beautiful view. Some of the ideas of the holes were fantastic, especially #3, “the intimidator”. The fairways were so incredibly clear cut. If I got punished, it was because I made a bad shot, not because there was a random tree in the middle of the fairway. The back 9 was a little less impressive, particularly holes 16 and 18 were lackluster. 16 was not a good hole. 18 would be good playing a second time, I just didn’t know where the basket was. However, that front 9 earned a 5 star for this course. It was incredible. Great job.

@smoovemulatto
Beautiful well kept course.
@chip10
Great little course, allows for beginners and other play together.

@collettchen
Course is excellent. Well maintained. Creative. Difficult. Great people. LOTS of trees. Lots of shade.

@camhoff
It's not technical, it's gimmicky. Playing this course was not fun

@pastoryoder
What a course!

@cbrock777
This is a truly beautiful, enjoyable, and challenging larger park course. Front 9 Is considerably more scorable than the back. Nice technical par threes and par fours, challenging hillsides which can cause rollaways in the back, but still fun. Beautiful big leafy green trees, winding creek beds, and good elevation changes up and down. It is a serious workout, and actually think it's more challenging/has more "teeth" than say Little Mulberry Park. Regardless, definitely in my top 10. Would highly recommend, and will for sure come back!

@kennymocks
Great course, pretty technical, but very accurate info and nice teepads and bathroom off of hole 4.

@jackbees12
Fun course. Good hike

@frankiejpainter
Beautiful but hilly course. The fall leaves make it harder to find your discs so a spotter is helpful.

@bryanmt20
Great course! You don’t need max distance but you do need to hit your lines. Very well kept, clean tee pads and fairways. Basket positions change monthly, great variety. Bring your bomber buddies here and see if they can keep up. Fun for everyone.

@davisjones
One of the best courses around!

@psoffl
Overall this course is a great technical course. Hole 17, however, is fundamentally flawed and an unfair hole. Even the perfect shot can/will roll down the near 45 degree slope leaving you with a bogie. I play this course all the time and I started skipping it to play 12 again then 18.

@a17sturm
Great, shorter technical course in the woods . The walking trails intertwine with the course and causes people hazards on many holes.

@andrewhathaway
If you’ve never played disc golf before, and/or hate yourself, you might find that you’ve had a small ounce of fun after playing a round at Suwanee Creek. However, if you’re somewhat competent at throwing the disc, don’t come here. Chattahoochee Pointe is 10 minutes away and believe me, it’s worth the extra 10 minutes. Course is kept well, but it’s easily the most poorly designed course I’ve ever played. There are a few well designed holes, but for the most part, this course consists of bad shapes, flukey trees, and more. Rather than offering a challenge, the holes that seemed “tougher” were only so because of the impossibility of reaching the baskets. WARNING ⚠️: if you do intend to make your it life miserable and play a round at this course, make sure to watch your disc to the ground. Very easy to lose a disc due to the overwhelming amount of leaves on the ground (this fact does not contribute to my rating, I rated it merely based on course design)