Woodcock Creek

@hnciii

82

Needs tee pads, and 17 and 18 fairways needs cut more often

@tacodad02

25

Blues should be redesigned.

@lcamoline1

21

Fantastic course!

@dynam3d

37

Shot difficulty varies more on this course than any course I’ve played. Some holes are super easy, some are stupid hard. At least one hole has no fairway while others are wide open.

@jaredshanks

63

fun course to go get your disc golf fix at. grass tees can be VERY slick in the evenings.

@jgeiman

91

Wow. Was not expecting the quality of this course. Blew my expectations away. If it had teepads it would easily be a 4.3. Regardless, it wasn’t bad.

@alexferry

22

Pro tees are insanely hard, especially on the back 9. Some shots have super tight gaps. Think 6’ or less wide fairways at 400+ feet. Half a star redacted for hole 2 alone. There is no real line, IMO. Spike anhyzer over the road will lose you a disc if thrown at the pin. Aim 60 feet right if you dare to try it.

@drowe111

22

Nice but wet

@lukeshelton

73

Such a fabulous course! Great variety of open and wooded hole. Fun hole designs. Incredible scenery. Will definitely be back!

@jordloy

24

The front 9 are phenomenal. The back 9, not so much. Could def use a redesign on the back

@breed21

79

Blue tees are poorly thought out and many are unplayable/dangerous. Many blue tees have no real lines. Pars seem to be randomly assigned. Some tee signs seem to be in the middle of the tee area and there are trees in some tee areas. Other tees may be better, but I would avoid the blues. Only thing this course has going for it (based on the blue tees) is that the walk is pleasant.

@pnwdylan

135

Front 9 is amazing!! Then the ridiculous back 9 begins.... The walks are ridiculously long, lots of wasted space. I'd prefer playing the front 9 multiple times then ever touch the back 9

@mercthejerk

92

Great shot variety, #11 is a dumb blind shot

@vink88

42

Absolutely love the layout, the hole designs are creative and interesting. Good mix of woods, open, and park style. Only thing keeping this from being a 5 for me is the lack of tee pads. Also, as a lefty, some of the tee signs are placed so that I could easily hit them in my backswing. .

@mwooley75

27

Front 9 is very scoreable, the back 9 is humbling and difficult. It’s designed for amateurs, or easier play through. The back nice from any tee location is ment for more skilled, and harder golf lines. Run the score up on the front, and try to keep it in the back. Hidden gem in pa!

@spencedt

22

Front 9 was great as it has been, first time playing back 9, didn’t finish due to conditions. Could use some work.

@snake82

19

One of the best courses around. Front and Back nine have good mix of longer and shorter holes. Skunk cabbage marsh on hole 6 collects discs like no one’s business, so don’t shank one into there. Hole 11 has been a swamp all season so may want to consider skipping it. Other than that, amazing course!

@ethanwiley

22

Great course aside from unrealistic pars on the back nine. 450 ft through the woods with tiny gaps are called 3s here.

@spangb

163

F9 blues still fun and challenging. Tee pads would be wonderful

@flyingzaucer

39

Beautiful course, pretty challenging back nine, doesn’t have tee posts like the front, but every hole is marked with all three on a stake at least. A lot of the par threes seem like fours, Hope this map helps!